
Warning letters, 483s, Recalls, Import Alerts, Audit observations
Medgel, India was issued a Warning letter by USFDA in July 2023. Deficiencies include inadequate OOS investigations and hypothesis of sample preparation error as root cause without scientific basis, inadequate investigation of deviations – several humidity excursions in manufacturing area for OTC capsules, humidity excursions in stability chambers. Warning letter cites failure of Quality Unit with Data Integrity issues including inadequate control of documents – access to documents, disposal of documents, contemporaneous documentation and review of raw data, sharing of passwords in analytical equipments, lack of procedures for review of audit trails. Warning letter also raises concern over failure of the Firm to test Diethylene Glycol (DEG) and Ethylene Glycol (EG) contamination in Glycerin, Propylene Glycol and Sorbitol used in manufacture of drug products and lapses in input component testing & controls. The Medgel site in Pithampur, MP India (FEI 3010165392) was inspected in January 2023.
Qvents review the Warning letter observations, in a series of three posts.
Observation 3
Inadequate component identity testing and impurity testing of components used in drug product manufacture,
Response provided by the Firm to FDA is inadequate as it did not address risk assessment of products in market, interim plans for the products in market. Firm to perform independent assessment of material system, qualification of suppliers, adequacy of input material controls and establish remediation measures, provide procedures for supplier COA validation program and program for qualifying contract testing laboratories.
Contamination of Pharmaceutical ingredients like Glycerin, Propylene Glycol, Sorbitol, Mannitol etc with toxic contaminants like Diethylene Glycol (DEG) and Ethylene Glycol (EG) has been a major concern with all regulatory agencies. Several critical lethal poisoning incidents are reported due to high levels of Diethylene glycol (DEG), Ethylene glycol (EG)Â in drug products by different agencies including WHO, USFDA.
When Firms adopt Supplier/Vendor Certificate of Analysis (CoA) for approving materials it should be governed by adequate procedures. Procedure for Vendor Qualification & Approval shall evaluate the vendor quality systems and reliability to ensure quality and integrity of materials supplied. The Vendor Qualification shall involve testing of initial samples (prior to commercial delivery), and testing of initial lots supplied for full specifications. After this, once confidence is built on the supplies and supplier, a reduced testing procedure may be implemented, for accepting materials based on Vendor CoA. Criteria for implementing a reduced testing procedure should be defined and implemented – e.g. no failure or rejection of supplies made, comparable test results for parameters between the supplier and the Firm, audit / review of the supplier’s Quality system, controls in place to deliver material conforming to quality and integrity each time. Also perform a risk assessment, identify any additional measures required before implementing a reduced testing programme for each material. When adopting a reduced testing procedure, not all parameters shall be skipped from testing – at least one specific identity test shall be performed on each container; and critical parameters, toxic impurities which can cause catastrophic consequence shall be tested in every consignment. There should also be a procedure for periodic evaluation, when materials will be tested for full specifications at predefined frequency like for example– every 5th or 10th consignment. And if any OOS / failures are observed during such periodic testing all the lots from previous consignments become suspect and should be tested; Adequate reserve samples should be retained for all lots of pharmaceutical components – APIs, Ingredients, primary packing materials for such investigation.
 When Firms use contract testing facilities, they shall be evaluated and qualified. The qualification should include an audit and evaluation of the Quality systems and GMP compliance of the testing facility. Agreements should be established between the Firm and the Testing facility clearly delineating roles and responsibilities. The testing facilities should also be available for audits by regulatory agencies, whenever required.
Also refer the post:
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.