Qvents Template |
Excipient Risk Assessment Ongoing Risk Review |
Excipient
Name |
|
Material Code |
|
Excipient
Manufacturer |
|
Assessment
Document Number |
|
Material Origin
(Animal / Vegetable / Mineral / Synthesis /Others |
|
Original
Excipient Risk Assessment Document Reference |
|
Review Period |
|
Review Date |
|
Element
of GMP |
Impact / Risk on drug product
categorization |
Level of Impact |
Number of
product defects connected to batches of excipient received; |
Low:
Nil to One,
positive resolution of issue Medium:
> 1 but less
than 1% of batches, positive resolution of the issue High:
>1%,
resolution pending |
|
Type /
severity of product defects |
Low:
Not impacting
CQAs High:
Impacting CQAs
of drug product and / or BA / BE attributes of the product |
|
Monitoring
and trend analysis of excipient quality; |
Low:
Consistent
quality, low variability on CQAs of excipient quality parameters High:
High
variability on CQAs of excipient quality parameters |
|
Loss of
relevant quality system and/or GMP certification of excipient manufacturer; |
Low: All systems and
certificates maintained High: Loss or suspension of GMP /
Quality system certifications |
|
Trends
in drug product quality attributes connected to excipient used |
Low:
No emerging
trends, drug product quality trend is consistent on parameters that can be
impacted by excipient High:
Emerging
trends, high variability on drug product quality / performance attributes
that can be connected to excipients |
|
Organizational,
Procedural or Technical/ process changes at the excipient manufacturer; |
Low:
If no changes or changes are administrative High:
Management
changes, Process changes, specification changes |
|
Excipient Control Strategy |
|||
S.No |
Strategy |
Control
strategy revision guide # |
Control
Strategies - Conclusion |
|
Acceptance based on COA
and documentation support |
· Maintain
status is impact on drug product defects, severity of defects are Low, quality trend of excipient is consistent,
GMP certifications are maintained. · Move
from strategy 1 to 2 or 3 if there are major process or technical changes · If
Impact is Medium move to control strategy 2
or 3 |
|
|
Acceptance testing – Every
Lot |
· Maintain
status If impact on CQAs, composition risk, variability risk, Manufacturer
reliability risk is High, · If excipient
impact on drug product CQAs, functional attributes, BA / BE risk, composition
risk, daily intake risk, excipient variability risk, manufacturer reliability
risk is High · Move
from strategy 1 or 2 to 2 or 3 if there are major process or technical
changes · Move
from Control strategy 1 and 3 to 2 if impact on drug product defects,
severity of defects are High, quality trend
is highly inconsistent. GMP certification status is changed |
|
|
Acceptance testing –
Periodic / Skip testing |
· Maintain
status if impact on drug product defects, severity of defects are Low, quality trend of excipient is consistent,
GMP certifications are maintained. · If
Impact is Medium move to control strategy 2
or 3 from 1 · Move
from control strategy 1 or 2 to 2 or 3 if there are major process or
technical changes |
|
|
Microbial testing |
· Maintain
status If Viral safety risk, Microbial / Endotoxin contamination risk is High
to Medium · Introduce
if there are microbial testing failures of drug product connected to
excipient. |
|
|
Prequalification audit |
· Not
applicable |
|
|
Prequalification audit and
routine audits. |
· Maintain
periodic audits if sterility risk is High · Introduce
periodic audits if there is loss or discontinuation of GMP certificate |
|
|
Unacceptable |
Consider
change to Unacceptable / Discontinuation of excipient if: · impact
on drug product defects, severity of defects are High,
quality trend of excipient is highly inconsistent, GMP certifications are
lost due to malpractices, deviations. |
|
#
- The list is indicative |
|
|
|
|